Jump to content

Sorry!

This site is in read-only mode right now. You can browse all our old topics (and there's a lot of them) but you won't be able to add to them.

admin/mod


EMC

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

there is so much porn on the net it boggles the mind and you fags are all bitchin about a thread that got closed .... :doh:

i'm not allowed to look at porn :wink:

ahhhh being monitored after your release from prison ah, gotya

i think its only fair rose gets banned for ruining the best thread on this forum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NO! :naughty:

Rose was suspended for 4 days for posting explicit material in the Hot girls thread which was a direct violation of forum rules. Much of the material in that thread progressively got worse as it went on. It is unfortunate, but several WARNINGS were posted in the thread to tone the pics down. Equally as unfortunate was the fact that Rose took the brunt of the complaint as many others had posted borderline material in the thread. Rose makes a fantastic contribution in her colourful way to BBNZ - it was something we reluctantly had to do.

The forum is not R18 - it isn't intended to be. What you guys have failed to understand is that BBNZ survives on advertising. I am not convinced that many legitamate businesses are comfortable advertising on a site that openly supports this type of content. By continually posting these pics you potentially damage the future sustainability of the site.

Have some respect for those members that log on to the site to legitamately share the love of iron sports. It is a shame that a few feel its their right to undermine what is good and potentially risk what is 99% of the time a great place to share experience and network.

Pseu will no doubt post a response to all regarding content posted on the site - in the meanime it would be helpful if we didn't have to clean this stuff up while we have time to discuss.

Dissapointing. :roll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really have a dog in the fight one way or another, because I don't really read in that section and didn't see the thread or offending material in question.

I just think it's kinda questionable to discipline an otherwise strong contributor, to that degree, for something like that without at least giving a warning first.

I mean if it was a chronic issue, sure, but to temp-ban someone for something like that seems excessive to me. Granted it's not my board and not my decision, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not convinced that many legitamate businesses are comfortable advertising on a site that openly supports this type of content.:

yet these businesses are comfortable advertising on a site that allows discussion of an illegal substance? not a criticism by any means, just a thought

Link to comment
Share on other sites




  • Popular Contributors

    Nobody has received reputation this week.

×
×
  • Create New...