subcutaneous or intramuscular injection?

[Jeepfanatixs]

I stumbled upon an interesting  topic: 

 Dr. Crisler has taken his extensive clinical experience and written a practical "best practices" guide for both clinicians and patients to follow. Testosterone Replacement Therapy—A Recipe For Success.

 

He suggests  that subcutaneous testosterone injections give you more bang for the buck, even suggesting that 80 mg. of testosterone given sub-Q works as well as 100 mg. given intramuscularly.

 

Here is a video where he explains:

 

I would love to hear your input, opinions and considerations?

[Daz69]

23 hours ago, Jeepfanatixs said:

I stumbled upon an interesting  topic: 

 Dr. Crisler has taken his extensive clinical experience and written a practical "best practices" guide for both clinicians and patients to follow. Testosterone Replacement Therapy—A Recipe For Success.

 

He suggests  that subcutaneous testosterone injections give you more bang for the buck, even suggesting that 80 mg. of testosterone given sub-Q works as well as 100 mg. given intramuscularly.

 

I would love to hear your input, opinions and considerations?

 

This paper shows no significant difference in pharmacokinetic profile or metabolites between SC and IM..

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/sm2.80