Jump to content

Sorry!

This site is in read-only mode right now. You can browse all our old topics (and there's a lot of them) but you won't be able to add to them.

Site pinning the guns???

maassive

By maassive
in Steroids & prescription meds

 Share

Recommended Posts

Oblix Member

Oblix

Posted
Posted

Depth is not of concern? why not use 1/4 inch pins then?

You definitly want spread injects but you will run into problems going that shallow, your glutes for example you could end up going into fat not muscle. Your also not getting deep enough into the muscle belly and will end up with more lumpy looking muscles if thew scar tissue is too close to the surface.

Use common sense. Quarter inch is pushing it, you'd need to use tiny volumes.

Half inch works well as I've said with 1-1.5mL.

Bullshit about not getting deep enough into the muscle belly with half inch.

How big are your arms?

How long you been site injecting?

Scar tissue builds up over time, you cant totally avoid it. The closer to the surface the scars the more likely you will get lumps being visible.

Why would you want to inject less than 3ml, if your trying to cause site enchancement? Simple use the mgs you want to inject that day and fill the rest of the barrel with Sterile GSO.

I give up! I'm not talking about site enhancement... pinning in general. A bit off topic considering the thread's topic. Sorry if that got you a bit confused?

I don't site inject for enhancement. Especially not using GSO. It dissipates too quickly and as such is a waste of time for this purpose (IMO). Have you heard of hyaluronic acid?

Got proof of running into problems by going that shallow? I don't think so... definitely not with 1-1.5mL injects as I'm talking about. I make all my gear from powder and my shit doesn't sting and inflame like some of the stuff you're probably used to. I probably wouldn't inject that stuff shallow either.

How long you been pinning, of course you can do half inch deep shots, dosnt mean you should. And wrong my gear dont inflame, but you do enough shots, you grow 22in arms, you realise whats best and whats whats not. You do this for long enough you will realise it too. Ive injected litres of GSO in my body, never had a problem, never had a infection, or a lump. And im real happy you make your own oil from powder, from china that you have no idea what the f*ck it really is, im happy for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andre01 Member

Andre01

Posted
Posted

As a medical professional (Official RN at the end of the year), I would only suggest you use a max of 1ml in the arm. The muscle is not big enough to handle anything more, rotate the site every time you are sticking yourself, try to never use the same place to often in a row, in the same arm.

If you are using anything more than that you really need to use a larger muscle such as the thigh or buttock.

Just my 2c worth.

post-8294-14166822841052_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DANIEL8 Senior member

DANIEL8

Posted
Posted
As a medical professional (Official RN at the end of the year), I would only suggest you use a max of 1ml in the arm. The muscle is not big enough to handle anything more, rotate the site every time you are sticking yourself, try to never use the same place to often in a row, in the same arm.

If you are using anything more than that you really need to use a larger muscle such as the thigh or buttock.

Just my 2c worth.

i think the point of shooting the arms is to stetch the fascia (you know what i mean) therefore putting in more than it can safely handle to stretch it and grow your arms the size of phil heath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chemo Senior member

Chemo

Posted
Posted

So will pinning any substance (test e) in a specific muscle group will help blow it out a bit?

I had always thought this was bullshit, besides the use of synthlol. There is some extra growth to be had from site pinning?!

Could those who have said it's worked give some sort of example of the cosmetic differences they noticed and from what volume of aas they pinned with?!

Would love to bring up the biceps!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DANIEL8 Senior member

DANIEL8

Posted
Posted
So will pinning any substance (test e) in a specific muscle group will help blow it out a bit?

I had always thought this was bullshit, besides the use of synthlol. There is some extra growth to be had from site pinning?!

Could those who have said it's worked give some sort of example of the cosmetic differences they noticed and from what volume of aas they pinned with?!

Would love to bring up the biceps!

if you shoot your bi's 1 - 1/2 hour before training them the pump you get will feel like every meal youve had before hand was made out of dianabols thats how good it is.

just try it bro, what u have to lose?

normally i shoot 1 - 1.5 ml each bicep, thats not enough to stretch the fascia but enough to get some awesome pump

do it bro

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Android Veteran member

Android

Posted
Posted
So will pinning any substance (test e) in a specific muscle group will help blow it out a bit?

I had always thought this was bullshit, besides the use of synthlol. There is some extra growth to be had from site pinning?!

Could those who have said it's worked give some sort of example of the cosmetic differences they noticed and from what volume of aas they pinned with?!

Would love to bring up the biceps!

I've got delts workout tomorrow, will take a pic before I pin, and then one after workout. Is that what you wanna see?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
maassive Senior member

maassive

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Slight tangent, but does anyone have any evidence or literature that AAS is more active locally and decreases in efficiency the further from the injection point? This is similar to site pinning theory, but slightly wider. For example, do you think pinning delts is more likely to help with upper body (say chest) than pinning quads?

I know TWL referred to literature that said glutes were best for overall bioavaliablity, but I still wonder about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
I Declare War Veteran member

I Declare War

Posted
Posted
Slight tangent, but does anyone have any evidence or literature that AAS is more active locally and decreases in efficiency the further from the injection point? This is similar to site pinning theory, but slightly wider. For example, do you think pinning delts is more likely to help with upper body (say chest) than pinning quads?

I know TWL referred to literature that said glutes were best for overall bioavaliablity, but I still wonder about this.

If it were more active locally I'm sure I'd have noticed it by now... either way, I don't think that the effect would be significant enough to worry about. You're better off concentrating on other things such as training and diet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
maassive Senior member

maassive

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Slight tangent, but does anyone have any evidence or literature that AAS is more active locally and decreases in efficiency the further from the injection point? This is similar to site pinning theory, but slightly wider. For example, do you think pinning delts is more likely to help with upper body (say chest) than pinning quads?

I know TWL referred to literature that said glutes were best for overall bioavaliablity, but I still wonder about this.

If it were more active locally I'm sure I'd have noticed it by now... either way, I don't think that the effect would be significant enough to worry about. You're better off concentrating on other things such as training and diet.

Fair point, particularly about the difference being likely minimal. So do you just pin one area, or rotate for scar tissue? I do Quad quad delt delt

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Daz69 Senior member

Daz69

Posted
Posted
Slight tangent, but does anyone have any evidence or literature that AAS is more active locally and decreases in efficiency the further from the injection point? This is similar to site pinning theory, but slightly wider. For example, do you think pinning delts is more likely to help with upper body (say chest) than pinning quads?

I know TWL referred to literature that said glutes were best for overall bioavaliablity, but I still wonder about this.

There's nothing about regarding whole upper-body efficiency, but I've quite a bit about pinning glutes in preference to delts...

And a whole lot of stuff regarding ester release patterns, I'll find it & send it you...!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Android Veteran member

Android

Posted
Posted

Different muscles release the compound slightly differently, according to the steroid bible (I think it was, was an online copy printed out doing the rounds). Glutes release faster and bit erratically, whereas shoulders were slower than glutes and steadier...I think it was that way around.

Would have to re-borrow the book and re-read all this stuff, has nothing to do with site pinning for growth of guns tho...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pyro Senior member

pyro

Posted
Posted
I'm more interested in the long term effects of site pinning. As is will the inflammation/fascia stretch yield any size?

I might have to start pinning my dick to "stretch the fascia" and get that mofo up from 10 to 11 :pfft:

1cm wouldn't be a noticeable increase would it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kracka Junior member

Kracka

Posted
Posted
I'm more interested in the long term effects of site pinning. As is will the inflammation/fascia stretch yield any size?

I might have to start pinning my dick to "stretch the fascia" and get that mofo up from 10 to 11 :pfft:

1cm wouldn't be a noticeable increase would it?

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
maassive Senior member

maassive

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I'm more interested in the long term effects of site pinning. As is will the inflammation/fascia stretch yield any size?

I might have to start pinning my dick to "stretch the fascia" and get that mofo up from 10 to 11 :pfft:

Don't do it. I was doing GH sub q under the foreskin for awhile and then it got so heavy I couldn't get it up. Now I have stretch marks so bad I can't tell my dick from a v-j j.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
maassive Senior member

maassive

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Slight tangent, but does anyone have any evidence or literature that AAS is more active locally and decreases in efficiency the further from the injection point? This is similar to site pinning theory, but slightly wider. For example, do you think pinning delts is more likely to help with upper body (say chest) than pinning quads?

I know TWL referred to literature that said glutes were best for overall bioavaliablity, but I still wonder about this.

There's nothing about regarding whole upper-body efficiency, but I've quite a bit about pinning glutes in preference to delts...

And a whole lot of stuff regarding ester release patterns, I'll find it & send it you...!!!

Yeah keen to read it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Popular Contributors

    Nobody has received reputation this week.

×
×
  • Create New...