Disclosing HIV + positive status

[jono]

This is a purely Hypothetical scenario cornfed... Im just wondering if you would be willing to do so.. say for a sum of money... not a lot.. just enough to compensate you for the hasle.

Would you do it ? ...

or to prove a point ?

If I were to participate in such a scheme as suggested then I would expect to be very well compensated, as the whole thing seems rather unhealthy and unpleasant. Having such a large volume of blood transfused would be very hard on the liver and kidneys (even though I assume this chap would at least have to have the same blood-type as me). What's more, if the chap were generally unhealthy or lived a high risk lifestyle or were on "HIV" meds with the resulting opportunistic infections, then I would be at risk of any number of serious heath problems from transfusions of his blood. The very suggestion seems rather silly to me.

A better idea would be, say, for me to drink the breast milk of an otherwise healthy and unmedicated "HIV+" woman. I understand the quack medical establishment regards this as a high risk behaviour - indeed such women have been prosecuted for breastfeeding their babies in some places. Hence if the quacks were right, I would stand a high chance of becoming "HIV positive" over the course of a year or so. Better still, such a scheme would not require a doctor's supervision of participation. So if someone would source a suitable volunteer and put, say, $100k into a trust fund to be transferred to me in the event that I did not consistently give positive test results after a period of two years or so, then I would most likely agree to such a proposition.

Maybe you can prove it to the rest of the human race that HIV , AIDS is a consipiracy by bravely swapping blood with a so called HIV+ positive person ?

The thing is that there are scores of thousands of people who tested positive years ago and have no symptoms of "AIDS", who test negative and have symptoms, who indulge in behaviour regarded as high risk and neither test positive nor develop symptoms and so fourth. One more person in one of these categories is not going to make any difference. Besides, most people are sheeple who will just believe whatever the mainstream media tells them regardless of the evidence.

i find it both strange and disturbing you would agree to do that

[Cornfed]

i find it both strange and disturbing you would agree to do that

Breast milk is perfectly nutritious, and besides, this idea would tend to cut out other possible health risks associated with blood transfusion, leaving only the supposed risk of HIV transmission, which is no risk given that HIV is a lab fantasy.

[deegee]

i find it both strange and disturbing you would agree to do that

Breast milk is perfectly nutritious, and besides, this idea would tend to cut out other possible health risks associated with blood transfusion, leaving only the supposed risk of HIV transmission, which is no risk given that HIV is a lab fantasy.

I dont quite get this, so what you are saying cornfed is that if tomorrow my doc told me I was hiv+ I could just ignore him and I would not have any health problems out of the ordinary ?

[Cornfed]

I dont quite get this, so what you are saying cornfed is that if tomorrow my doc told me I was hiv+ I could just ignore him and I would not have any health problems out of the ordinary ?

The test seems to detect the products of a cellular repair mechanism invoked to repair oxidative damage. Hence it might indicate that you were under oxidative stress and should take an antioxidant and clean up your lifestyle. Other that that, yes, although you would certainly want to check out the issue for yourself.

[deegee]

You ar saying the test is not accurate, however I may still get aids

[Cornfed]

You ar saying the test is not accurate, however I may still get aids

The tests are a scam, but since they may show you are under oxidative stress, a positive test would tend to correlate to increased risk of various health problems, including the 30+ conditions said to be indicators of "AIDS". So for example, there are parts of Africa where 70+% of people give positive test results. These people are not going to all "get AIDS" any time soon, and in fact if that were the case most of those populations would have died off long ago. However, compared to Western populations they are generally less healthy and at increased risk of developing a number of illnesses.

[waxmistress]

The ELISA actually tests for antibody (IgM) responses to gp120 (a glycoprotein on the surface envelope of the virus).

[ExpensiveUrine]

Is there anything new (study wise) from 2002 onwards?