Jump to content

Sorry!

This site is in read-only mode right now. You can browse all our old topics (and there's a lot of them) but you won't be able to add to them.

2 guns ban a bunch of b.s?


mr natural

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

his statement had a question mark behind it as he was asking Dale a question if this is infact what Dale did.

Yep, and that's why I think it won't go anywhere.

It may have been asked in question form, but I think we are all intelligent enough to see that something was being implied.... and that is the crux of the law that Dale is reffering to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i also think this is all abit stupid. 2guns has been here for so long and we have all learnt alot from him DALE comes along and it seems not many people like him, causes just as much shit and 2guns gets suspended, dale if you wernt liked before you are even more disliked now as most people would rather read 2guns posts then yours, maybe you should just concentrate on running your buisness or maybe sit out the 2 weeks aswell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

also think this is all abit stupid. 2guns has been here for so long and we have all learnt alot from him DALE comes along and it seems not many people like him, causes just as much shit and 2guns gets suspended, dale if you wernt liked before you are even more disliked now as most people would rather read 2guns posts then yours, maybe you should just concentrate on running your buisness or maybe sit out the 2 weeks aswell.

Don't cry 8.

Would u like some counsilling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

also think this is all abit stupid. 2guns has been here for so long and we have all learnt alot from him DALE comes along and it seems not many people like him, causes just as much shit and 2guns gets suspended, dale if you wernt liked before you are even more disliked now as most people would rather read 2guns posts then yours, maybe you should just concentrate on running your buisness or maybe sit out the 2 weeks aswell.

Don't cry 8.

Would u like some counsilling?

ohh great now the MOJ have created an account and are posting comments like "don't cry" on a Saturday.. Glad my taxes are paying government staff to play on the internet on the weekends.

come on whos using multiple accoutns lol :pfft:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was pretty obvious what he was implying.

Took it WAY too far IMO.

:ditto:

now guys stop crying about it its two week ban not like its effecting anyone gezz, we all know the rules play by them or go somewere else

not a surprise this has happened two or three topics have been locked in last week or so and many more hijacked, we were all warned not long before this tht it would happen if we couldnt play nicely

Link to comment
Share on other sites

complete BS! dale your a tosser you really have to lighten up

if i was running a bizzo where the way i looked directly effected my earnings and someone repeatedly implyed i was on gear and i had stated i wasnt then i wood get pretty pissed off as well

yes dale has had a go at 2guns about being on gear but he openly admits he uses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was pretty obvious what he was implying.

Took it WAY too far IMO.

Even then, it still takes personal assumption to reach the conclusion that something is being implied when it's in question form. Lawyers would be going to court all the time for just implying a person did something otherwise (in the event the person accused was found innocent).

I would also think that a 21 (?) year old up and coming bodybuilder being litigated by a gym and supplements business would be more damaging to that business than questions about illegal activities on a forum that only 50 people regularly post on, but ah well.

I'm sure there'll be a lesson out there for someone anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was pretty obvious what he was implying.

Took it WAY too far IMO.

Even then, it still takes personal assumption to reach the conclusion that something is being implied when it's in question form. Lawyers would be going to court all the time for just implying a person did something otherwise (in the event the person accused was found innocent).

It's called popular innuendo. People can be found liable for implying something defamatory without flat out saying it. I've just spent two months studying defamation... And it's not a matter of guilt or innocence, it's a civil proceeding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That lesson is that these threads are made of lol and win. Okay okay maybe not win, but seriously Ministry of Justice? lol hahaha good times heh.

If something goes to far deal with it, if it's just shit talking thats making someone asshurt they need to harden up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




  • Popular Contributors

    Nobody has received reputation this week.

×
×
  • Create New...