Jump to content

Sorry!

This site is in read-only mode right now. You can browse all our old topics (and there's a lot of them) but you won't be able to add to them.

Which Wrestlers Are On Gear

keats

By keats
in Steroids & prescription meds

 Share

Recommended Posts

keats Senior member

keats

Posted
Posted

Sports Illustrated - whose investigations led to police raiding the 'anti-ageing' company selling the drugs - have now listed what each star was taking in the period up to the bust in February 2007.

John Morrison - Somatropin, anastrozole, testosterone, stanozolol and chorionic gonadotropin (a hormone produced naturally during pregnancy) between June 2006 and February 2007.

Randy Orton - Somatropin, nandrolone, stanozolol between September 2004 and February 2007.

Mr Kennedy - Anastrozole, somatropin and testosterone between October 2006 and February 2007.

William Regal - Stanozolol, somatropin, genotropin, and anastrozole between November 2004 and November 2006.

Edge - Somatropin, genotropin and stanozolol between September 2004 and February 2007.

Chavo Guerrero - Somatropin, nandrolone, anastrozole and 'other drugs' between April 2005 and May 2006.

Gregory Helms - Testosterone, genotropin, nandrolone and 'other drugs' between November 2003 and February 2007.

Charles Haas - Anastrozole, somatropin, stanozolol, nandrolone and chorionic gonadotropin between August 2006 and January 2007.

Umaga - Somatropin between July and December 2006.

Shoichi Funaki - Somatropin in March 2006.

This would be a small portion of the WWE that take gear, I assume most of them would but these are the ones 'busted'. WWE have a 'wellness policy' which tests for users. 3 positive tests mean termination of contract. Wonder how stringent they are on the piss cup test.. Go home and bring your own sample

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frogie2001 Senior member

frogie2001

Posted
Posted

they had this on a sports show over in the uK. basically asking if vince mcmann will do drugs testing on his wrestlers, he said "No" basically because he argued that no other work place screens for performance enhancing substances. i.e if an accountant could take a pill that would make them better at their job would they make it illegal and screen for it. I thought he made a fair point. it's not like it's a competitive sport (i.e often their is a script etc)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Popular Contributors

    Nobody has received reputation this week.

×
×
  • Create New...