Jump to content

Sorry!

This site is in read-only mode right now. You can browse all our old topics (and there's a lot of them) but you won't be able to add to them.

High tren/low test

Chemo

By Chemo
in Steroids & prescription meds

 Share

Recommended Posts

Terrymundo Senior member

Terrymundo

Posted
Posted
Here we go again lol

On topic

Chemo less talk more action, just run it and see what happens. If you don't like it stop using it. Simple.

:think:

I'd be very neverous using Tren that high first time round. Why don't you start low test + low tren then if you feel comfortable after 2 weeks then look at upping the tren.

How play time have you had with 19nors? If you're like me you'll have pea lumps in no time with high tren.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

Riccardo Senior member

Riccardo

Posted
Posted
Just to clarify, prolactin won't do shit in the absence of estrogen. Kill estrogen with letrozole and you won't have gyno. DOn't bother with dirty whorish dopamine agonists.

whats yr thoughts on this theory Riccardo? Have u used Tren with low dose Test?

Never used high tren/low test before so can't comment from my own experience but from what I've seen I definitely think it is a viable option. The reasoning behind a higher dose of tren is sound as most of the side effects from tren are enhanced by the presence of high estrogen levels. Running a lower dose of test could be a good way of making sure there is low aromatization.

The other issue is that tren has a very high affinity for the androgen receptor, much more so than even testosterone. By using a low dose of testosterone you are ensuring that the test does not compete for binding on the AR. This means the Tren will be more effective but also means the androgenic side effects will be more pronounced (Hair loss, aggression etc.).

That's my take on things anyway and by the looks of things, many guys are raving about using this protocol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tomsammce Veteran member

tomsammce

Posted
Posted
Riccardo is right .. i eben on low test, high tren n high eq .. been good so far .. iam one of those gifted who neva got sides except for balls shrinkage .. and i know my gear is legit cause its not from any NZ source .. Tren is magic .. it just changes everything ..though sides like excessive sweating n breathign hard during workout is there but its still magic ..

Dude ur running 200mg a week of an enanthate ester with 100mg a day of an acetate ester that's not really that extreme of a high:low ratio.

And wow u know ur gear is legitimate because it doesn't come from nz. That's makes so much sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravi1414 Member

ravi1414

Posted
Posted
Riccardo is right .. i eben on low test, high tren n high eq .. been good so far .. iam one of those gifted who neva got sides except for balls shrinkage .. and i know my gear is legit cause its not from any NZ source .. Tren is magic .. it just changes everything ..though sides like excessive sweating n breathign hard during workout is there but its still magic ..

Dude ur running 200mg a week of an enanthate ester with 100mg a day of an acetate ester that's not really that extreme of a high:low ratio.

And wow u know ur gear is legitimate because it doesn't come from nz. That's makes so much sense.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tomsammce Veteran member

tomsammce

Posted
Posted
[MOD EDIT: No photos of other people, please.]

Why not? Can't have some skinny asswipe talking shit about gear and saying something is crap when he looks like that.

That's the problem with this forum too many skinny ppl preaching on the steroid forum who hide behind a computer screen.

It's not good for the genuine ppl on here who want actual advice, this guys just like ramy. It's dangerous.

You've got him telling ppl to run 700 tren and 200 test... Okay.jpeg

That's just dumb to me, at least if ppl saw his pic they can make a fairer decision to listen to him or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AgentOrange Veteran member

AgentOrange

Posted
Posted
[MOD EDIT: No photos of other people, please.]

Why not? Can't have some skinny asswipe talking shit about gear and saying something is crap when he looks like that.

That's the problem with this forum too many skinny ppl preaching on the steroid forum who hide behind a computer screen.

It's not good for the genuine ppl on here who want actual advice, this guys just like ramy. It's dangerous.

You've got him telling ppl to run 700 tren and 200 test... Okay.jpeg

That's just dumb to me, at least if ppl saw his pic they can make a fairer decision to listen to him or not.

Strong agree. I would even go as far as saying you should have to be approved to give advice here, through your reputation or personally recommended by an approved member.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pseudonym Veteran member

Pseudonym

Posted
Posted

Yep. I agree with almost everything you said, Tom. At least, before you deleted it. :P

The problem was that the photo was clearly identifiable. If you'd covered his face, it would have been better (although I'm still not sure that's enough). Our rules say you're not allowed to allege someone is using steroids, and through posting a photo of someone in this context, that's pretty much what you've done.

However, I'm all for weeding out any bad advice. If you've got any other suggestions on how to do that, let me know. (Sorry, AO - I think your "entry only on personal recommendation" suggestion would just turn the forum into an old boys club)

Just one catch - it has to be bad advice that you target, not just advice you disagree with!

The best technique I think is to keep asking questions that shows up the flaws in their argument. That way everyone learns, it doesn't stifle debate, and those with a different-but-legitimate point of view still get considered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
genetic freek Senior member

genetic freek

Posted
Posted
Yep. I agree with almost everything you said, Tom. At least, before you deleted it. :P

The problem was that the photo was clearly identifiable. If you'd covered his face, it would have been better (although I'm still not sure that's enough). Our rules say you're not allowed to allege someone is using steroids, and through posting a photo of someone in this context, that's pretty much what you've done.

However, I'm all for weeding out any bad advice. If you've got any other suggestions on how to do that, let me know. (Sorry, AO - I think your "entry only on personal recommendation" suggestion would just turn the forum into an old boys club)

Just one catch - it has to be bad advice that you target, not just advice you disagree with!

The best technique I think is to keep asking questions that shows up the flaws in their argument. That way everyone learns, it doesn't stifle debate, and those with a different-but-legitimate point of view still get considered.

I think We should use pictures as a refrance... In which case Ravi should not be posting in a bbing forum at all

Jokes aside we not talking about protein, it's Tren and it can have some harsh sides

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tomsammce Veteran member

tomsammce

Posted
Posted
As in Life....its up to the disconcerning user to sift out the good advise from the bad. Life is about judgement calls. If you dont make the call you will never have the experience & that is what we are here for.

Some ppl can't think for themselves and common sense is actually uncommon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Popular Contributors

    Nobody has received reputation this week.

×
×
  • Create New...