Jump to content

Sorry!

This site is in read-only mode right now. You can browse all our old topics (and there's a lot of them) but you won't be able to add to them.

Men's Physique Class...


hjp

Recommended Posts

All I'm saying is I doubt the drug using board shorts brigade are going to have trouble being overly muscular or overly dry/grainy when most of the actual drug using bodybuilders in nz don't even have that problem lol

Sorry my bad. Here was me thinking you were condoning these guys being on the juice at such a young age. I suppose this also means that the NZFBB has no intention of re-introducing drug testing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan Hibbs could win both classes if they still doing that gay double entry thing to fill up the stage lol

Hibbs is the opposite. He has good legs (short but good) its his upper body that dissapears when he turns side ways.

He could wear posing trunks and a long sleved T.

It reminds me of pumping iron when Arnold makes franco doing a side chest .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought That's why they wear bright board shorts so can still see when side on...

I reckon they need couple palm trees each side of stage and a sand pit for them to stand in... Those lil flax bushes and a trophy presenter with a sandy pit ain't cutting mustard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought That's why they wear bright board shorts so can still see when side on...

I reckon they need couple palm trees each side of stage and a sand pit for them to stand in... Those lil flax bushes and a trophy presenter with a sandy pit ain't cutting mustard

They need a pool to frolic in

[MOD EDIT:Inappropriate image. This is not The Playground.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was 2 men kissing how is that inappropriate?

Homophobic censorship is inappropriate and reported

john-mcroberts-pink-shirt-300.jpg

This man is not happy with you Mr Mod. :pfft:

It was a highly sexualised image that contributed nothing to the discussion. A discussion which I'm sure many people will open and read at work, school, or in the presence of their families. Those people might not appreciate such an image popping up on their screens.

I would have removed the image if it were of 2 females or a heterosexual couple in the exact same positions. No homophobic censorship, just censorship as it was not at all conducive to the topic at hand, and thus inappropriate.

Nice shirt, really brings out his eyes :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was 2 men kissing how is that inappropriate?

Homophobic censorship is inappropriate and reported

john-mcroberts-pink-shirt-300.jpg

This man is not happy with you Mr Mod. :pfft:

It was a highly sexualised image that contributed nothing to the discussion. A discussion which I'm sure many people will open and read at work, school, or in the presence of their families. Those people might not appreciate such an image popping up on their screens.

I would have removed the image if it were of 2 females or a heterosexual couple in the exact same positions. No homophobic censorship, just censorship as it was not at all conducive to the topic at hand, and thus inappropriate.

Nice shirt, really brings out his eyes :lol:

Fair call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it's called mens fitness class....

At least it is overseas... more of a modeling class I my opinion would be interesting to see the area's the judges judge this class on, i.e. do they judge it as a bodybuilding class where mass, conditioning, symmetry, and proportions are judged???

And if the are regulations to the length of your trunks etc, can they be short to show off legs or long to hide the sticks... :pfft:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it's called mens fitness class....

At least it is overseas... more of a modeling class I my opinion would be interesting to see the area's the judges judge this class on, i.e. do they judge it as a bodybuilding class where mass, conditioning, symmetry, and proportions are judged???

And if the are regulations to the length of your trunks etc, can they be short to show off legs or long to hide the sticks... :pfft:

I think this is a good point. Its all about the terminology of "Physique Class". It does not represent what these guys really are. They are not a complete physique as we understand it in BBing & should the class be called "Mens Sports Model or Fitness Model" it would better represent what is trying to be achieved imo.

In NABBA/WFF Australia there is a move away from naming the "Glamour Class" into a more appropriate & less pagentary "Sports Model". I hope that this will become the norm in NZ as well, when NABBA/WFF introduce the beach boys. Yes, they will be forced to do so because of the popularity of the class in IFBB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fq2.jpg

A back? Hamstrings? Who needs those. If you can see it it doesnt exist.

You're not the smartest one to rip into every post possible, are you?

You can see his hammys and he's not even completely side on. You can also see his lats soooo...

Some of these guys are might even be bodybuilders that don't quite back themselves to compete in a bodybuilding line-up, but stand a chance to compete against guys with beach bodies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fq2.jpg

A back? Hamstrings? Who needs those. If you can see it it doesnt exist.

You're not the smartest one to rip into every post possible, are you?

You can see his hammys and he's not even completely side on. You can also see his lats soooo...

Some of these guys are might even be bodybuilders that don't quite back themselves to compete in a bodybuilding line-up, but stand a chance to compete against guys with beach bodies?

you lose points if your back is too wide/muscular

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Popular Contributors

    Nobody has received reputation this week.

×
×
  • Create New...