Wookie Posted May 12, 2016 Report Share Posted May 12, 2016 http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2016/5/12/11662044/ufc-mma-news-interview-frank-mir-failed-drug-test-steroids-kangaroo-meat Quote Last month, it was revealed that Frank Mir tested positive for oral turiabol metabolites - an anabolic steroid - for his in-competition drug test relating to UFC Fight Night: Mir vs. Hunt. Mir, who lost via first round KO to 'Super Samoan', hinted that tainted kangaroo meat in Australia was perhaps responsible for his failed drug test, and the two-time heavyweight champion is using the same argument to defend his 'B' sample, which also flagged for performance-enhancing drugs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryB Posted May 12, 2016 Report Share Posted May 12, 2016 Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha and ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Wookie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maccaz Posted May 12, 2016 Report Share Posted May 12, 2016 dunno if it contains tbol but it certainly contains a strong stench lol. yuck Wookie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wookie Posted May 12, 2016 Author Report Share Posted May 12, 2016 The way he's going to get out of this is because his A and B samples were tested in the same lab, which isn't supposed to happen. Freaking funny though. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Roo meat would likely be harvested in the wild, rather than be some kind of Roo breeding farms where they get raised from birth, fed roids etc? Obviously Oral Turinabol to a kangaroo seems like a crazy choice too. PETN and HarryB 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryB Posted May 12, 2016 Report Share Posted May 12, 2016 No correction needed. That's what's so funny. And oral turanibol popular in Australia. Ummmmm not really if at all. Available... apparently yes.. popular not so much. PETN 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maccaz Posted May 13, 2016 Report Share Posted May 13, 2016 1 hour ago, Wookie said: The way he's going to get out of this is because his A and B samples were tested in the same lab, which isn't supposed to happen. Freaking funny though. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Roo meat would likely be harvested in the wild, rather than be some kind of Roo breeding farms where they get raised from birth, fed roids etc? Obviously Oral Turinabol to a kangaroo seems like a crazy choice too. yep, they dont farm them really i dont think, uneconomical when there is a massive quota that are allowed to be shot wild so i would say maccaz confirms kangaroos are natty Wookie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wookie Posted May 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2016 Frank Mir, couple Roo's loose in the top paddock, eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PETN Posted May 13, 2016 Report Share Posted May 13, 2016 1 hour ago, maccaz said: yep, they dont farm them really i dont think, uneconomical when there is a massive quota that are allowed to be shot wild so i would say maccaz confirms kangaroos are natty The fact that kangaroos arent herdable and can escape over fences that arent ridiculously high is considered to be a significant factor (along with no suitable crop species/lack of water in most of continent) why aboriginal culture was so underdeveloped and primitive. Couldn't escape the hunter gatherer way of life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maccaz Posted May 13, 2016 Report Share Posted May 13, 2016 32 minutes ago, PETN said: The fact that kangaroos arent herdable and can escape over fences that arent ridiculously high is considered to be a significant factor (along with no suitable crop species/lack of water in most of continent) why aboriginal culture was so underdeveloped and primitive. Couldn't escape the hunter gatherer way of life. other thing i read is they get sick quickly from stress when you try to herd/contain them, cos i suppose mentally they are more similar to rabbits than say cows. you chase them round they are skittish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wookie Posted May 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2016 So I was wondering, did Frank get Roo Rage? Pseudonym 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryB Posted May 13, 2016 Report Share Posted May 13, 2016 49 minutes ago, Wookie said: So I was wondering, did Frank get Roo Rage? Not sure but imma start eating roo meat from now on... come at me gainz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiwicannon Posted May 15, 2016 Report Share Posted May 15, 2016 Love me dem Turinabol strong dry gains less the bloat downside need pop 80-100mg ed! needa find me some Kanga meat! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pseudonym Posted May 15, 2016 Report Share Posted May 15, 2016 Damn, if I failed a drugs test because of tainted kangaroo meat, I'd be hopping mad. HarryB 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yeelang Posted May 16, 2016 Report Share Posted May 16, 2016 Mir sue ppl responsable for this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GyzzBrah Posted May 18, 2016 Report Share Posted May 18, 2016 On 13/05/2016 at 1:52 PM, PETN said: The fact that kangaroos arent herdable and can escape over fences that arent ridiculously high is considered to be a significant factor (along with no suitable crop species/lack of water in most of continent) why aboriginal culture was so underdeveloped and primitive. Couldn't escape the hunter gatherer way of life. Many pre ice age humans in the nordic countries and central europe faced similar harsh conditions below are some pictures of what I believe to be the skull of an aboriginal from the 1800's colonial era (hence the darker colour), compared alongside a skull of a typical modern male. Many of the nordic countries had very scarce access to resources due to the cold, as did the neanderthals and early humans during the ice age, prior to farming and domestication (around 12, 000 years ago) For comparison, below is a chimpanzee skull (our closest ancestor). The jaw is nothing similar to any human like species in either of the above comparisons, but the eye sockets and brow ridge are much more similar. I dont think scarcity of food had much to do with the hunter gatherer lifestyle, There are plenty of reptiles in australia too, and many african tribes as well as modern day people in louisiana etc eat reptiles frequently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australopithecus_afarensis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PETN Posted May 18, 2016 Report Share Posted May 18, 2016 Lol I get what you're saying but those pre ice age Europeans lived a hunter gatherer life too during those harsh conditions. It was only really domestication of plants and animals that allowed them to settle in one place and abandon the hunter gatherer lifestyle and develop further technology and I guess make increased brain capacity more so something that was selected for. No point having big developed brain and white skin if all you do all day is run around chasing and throwing sticks at fast animals in the hot sun to stay alive. Reptiles aren't suitable for farming for quite obvious reasons. Primarily most are carnivores rather than herbivores. Also they would be difficult to contain/herd. Aside from modern day bullshit like snake and crocodile farms for skins have never heard of reptiles being farmed and they are present on every continent that humans inhabited. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daz69 Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 Hey Gyzz... What happened in Northern, Central, and Southern Europe after the ice age, as opposed to Australia: Environment changed, glaciers melted and then followed a more temperate climate which produced opportunities for sedentary farming and crop growing.. Roughly about 7000 BC in the Levant the first static settlements arose which produced tools, weapons and pottery, these technologies progressed Northwards into Europe as the Glaciers melted.. That change in environment was the main precursor for the transition from hunter gatherer to neolithic culture, it produced opportunities. The barren hot deserts and harsher environment faced by aborigines couldn't sustain fixed sedentary lifestyle, hence they remained in a culture unable to change, due to environmental circumstances, also the fact Australia remained undiscovered therefore was unable to benefit from trade in new technologies, ideas, or goods.. Pseudonym and PETN 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GyzzBrah Posted May 21, 2016 Report Share Posted May 21, 2016 What about the persian deserts? Or arabia prior to islam? Also when european colonists arived in australia, they faced the same harsh conditions, yet thrived? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PETN Posted May 21, 2016 Report Share Posted May 21, 2016 15 minutes ago, GyzzBrah said: What about the persian deserts? Or arabia prior to islam? Also when european colonists arived in australia, they faced the same harsh conditions, yet thrived? The Europeans brought crops and domesticated animals. They didnt turn up and start farming kangaroos or reptiles. All the places where first civilisations grew weren't deserts. Some might be now and some are near deserts but all were fertile land with large river systems running nearby. Australia has places like that but it lacked suitable plant and animal species for farming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daz69 Posted May 21, 2016 Report Share Posted May 21, 2016 1 hour ago, GyzzBrah said: What about the persian deserts? Or arabia prior to islam? Also when european colonists arived in australia, they faced the same harsh conditions, yet thrived? The early Neolithic and bronze age static settlements originated around the large river systems of the Nile and Euphrates, not in dessert.. The first Australian convict settlers struggled for decades with harsh conditions even with knowledge of relatively modern farming and irrigation techniques, plus the additional help of supply ships from back home.. Remember sheep, crops and livestock were introduced from abroad, and were not indigenous to Australia... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryB Posted May 21, 2016 Report Share Posted May 21, 2016 Wasn't the whole point of what gyzzbrah was saying more to do with the aborigine being some sort of lesser species hence his comparison of skulls than a serious comment about anything else? Let's not waste sensible argument on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GyzzBrah Posted May 22, 2016 Report Share Posted May 22, 2016 Thats not true, Australian terrain is too hostile for early humans to thrive and develop, got nothing to do with species. The last non human species died long before movement out of Africa. Or so I hear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maccaz Posted May 22, 2016 Report Share Posted May 22, 2016 Gyzz you are straight up a fucking racist, disturbed, childish loser. Stick to your fucking journal, stop trying to sound smart and stop trying to be controversial (inb4 you claim you're not which you will) stick to your journal post about just your training (so at least it'll only be one post a month) and stop shoving stuff up your ass or baiting old gay guys to f*ck you. Straight up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GyzzBrah Posted May 22, 2016 Report Share Posted May 22, 2016 24 minutes ago, maccaz said: Gyzz you are straight up a fucking racist, disturbed, childish loser. Stick to your fucking journal, stop trying to sound smart and stop trying to be controversial (inb4 you claim you're not which you will) stick to your journal post about just your training (so at least it'll only be one post a month) and stop shoving stuff up your ass or baiting old gay guys to f*ck you. Straight up. Im not trying to be controversial, there are many things I believe that are well considered normal. You wont see me doing vegan ocr crossfit at the gym, or studying some weird uni degree, or wearing weird clothes, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maccaz Posted May 22, 2016 Report Share Posted May 22, 2016 15 minutes ago, GyzzBrah said: Im not trying to be controversial, there are many things I believe that are well considered normal. You wont see me doing vegan ocr crossfit at the gym, or studying some weird uni degree, or wearing weird clothes, etc. Stick to your journal post whatever bullshit you want in there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.