Pseudonym Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Pretty interesting... scientists have worked out that to make rice less digestible, just add oil. Bodybuilders know that adding fats to a meal can lower the glycemic index, but in this case it seems like it actually alters the starch too. Not all starches, as it happens, are created equal. Some, known as digestible starches, take only a little time to digest, are quickly turned into glucose, and then later glycogen. Excess glycogen ends up adding to the size of our guts if we don't expend enough energy to burn it off. Other starches, meanwhile, called resistant starches, take a long time to for the body to process, aren't converted into glucose or glycogen because we lack the ability to digest them, and add up to less calories. A growing body of research, however, has shown that it might be possible to change the types of starches found in foods by modifying how they are prepared. ... And rice, depending on the method of preparation, undergoes observable chemical changes. By adding a lipid (coconut oil in this case) ahead of cooking the rice, and then cooling the rice immediately after it was done, they were able to drastically change its composition - and for the better. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=11423408 soundsgood 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hu Gh Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Remind me why destroying the nutritional value of a food which has probably been grown at the expense of replacing some natural ecosystem with vegetation clearance and farm pollution, a food that you pay for by time from your limited life doing something you'd rather not do if you had a choice is a change 'for the better'... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GyzzBrah Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Why not eat less rice and therefore making your stash of rice last longer saving you money. Phagg0ts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeroid Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Bunch of poverty faggots above. If I can eat more rice and feel full yet still fit my macros/calorie intake then I'd do it. Nothing wrong with that pyro, Cameron_R and HarryB 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hu Gh Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Bunch of poverty faggots above. If I can eat more rice and feel full yet still fit my macros/calorie intake then I'd do it. Nothing wrong with that why not just mix sawdust with your food then? cheaper and basically same thing. youd be better off eating more and getting bigger and stronger anyway rather than staying at a natty weight. like i reckon your lifts be better wilkes/glossbrenner competing at 100kg BW than at whatever you compete at now if similar bf%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GyzzBrah Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 Why would you want to eat MORE food for less calories? Im happy eating less food for less calories and I still feel full. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maccaz Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 Why would you want to eat MORE food for less calories? Im happy eating less food for less calories and I still feel full.thats abnormal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingersman Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 Some people have large appetites and dont get full off 2kcal or even 4kcal for some of the gifted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GyzzBrah Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 A clear example is FOTR who gags on 50g protein, while strong gened westerners like maccaz can eat a 1kg burger in 15 mins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hu Gh Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 If you still feel hungry then you prob need to eat more unless youre just fat in which case you should feel hungry all the time because should be dieting to lose all the fat. you still gonna feel hungry if youre filling up on 'food' your body isnt able to absorb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryB Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 I actually have a really crappy appetite also. Give me the most cals for the least eating and I'm happy. And no realtalk I can't get enough KFC down. 1 burger and I'm full. FellowshipOfTheRon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maccaz Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 A clear example is FOTR who gags on 50g protein, while strong gened westerners like maccaz can eat a 1kg burger in 15 mins.then you would want more calories per volume of food, not less ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pseudonym Posted March 27, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 First of all, feeling full has nothing to do with whether you're in a caloric surplus or caloric deficit. You can be piling on the weight and still feel hungry, or losing it and still feel satiated. (And yes - I think you would still feel equally full on this "treated" rice, in the same way that you can fill up on veges that are all fibre.) Secondly, it's not just about calories - it's about macronutrients as well. Even if I want lots of calories, I don't necessarily want them coming from shitloads of carbs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hu Gh Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 First of all, feeling full has nothing to do with whether you're in a caloric surplus or caloric deficit. You can be piling on the weight and still feel hungry, or losing it and still feel satiated. (And yes - I think you would still feel equally full on this "treated" rice, in the same way that you can fill up on veges that are all fibre.) Secondly, it's not just about calories - it's about macronutrients as well. Even if I want lots of calories, I don't necessarily want them coming from shitloads of carbs. Wouldnt it make more sense then to eat things high in protein/fat then and less carbs rather than filling up on wrecked rice? If you in a deficit you always going to feel hungry. Even if you feel 'full' after eating your dinner of shit rice then youre going to feel hungry as f*ck next day and still just as likely to cheat on diet with other food etc. IMO youre a shit c*nt if you throw away/wreck good food. Just eat less volume of food and your stomach will shrink and youll feel full off less. This is stupidity along the same principles as stuffing your face full of high cal foods while taking weight loss drugs to mitigate weight gain. HarryB 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeroid Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 Heaps of food gets wasted anyway. Not like you gonna send that rice to north Korea. Not your usual yolo style azide. I'm disappointed Realtalk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ngapuhi strong Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 doesnt matter if im eating 1400cal a day or 4000cal, im still hungry, but then again i didnt get to be a big fat c*nt from not eating much lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maccaz Posted March 28, 2015 Report Share Posted March 28, 2015 doesnt matter if im eating 1400cal a day or 4000cal, im still hungry, but then again i didnt get to be a big fat c*nt from not eating much lol lol me tooif i ate to completely full whenever i wanted to brb 150kg 80% bf lol Tonkintechnique and ngapuhi strong 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FellowshipOfTheRon Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 not my cup of tea as i prefer most caloric dense food + easy to digest vs something like that which would make you full just like normal rice but have less useful energy.. seems like a tremendous waste of time but perhaps someone out there could draw some benefit from it if it helped them curb their hunger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeroid Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 why not just mix sawdust with your food then? cheaper and basically same thing.youd be better off eating more and getting bigger and stronger anyway rather than staying at a natty weight. like i reckon your lifts be better wilkes/glossbrenner competing at 100kg BW than at whatever you compete at now if similar bf%.Cos sawdust isn't edible food and tastes disgusting and dry, I'd imagine? Pretty obvious why I wouldn't do that. I'm assuming rice still has same taste and texture when cooked this way. And I'd only do it if cutting cos I'm always hungry when on a caloric deficit and anything that helps with satiety is good. Yeah I am trying to bulk ATM but been stuck at 87kg for the last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazyfacials Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 I actually have a really crappy appetite also. Give me the most cals for the least eating and I'm happy. And no realtalk I can't get enough KFC down. 1 burger and I'm full. Going to have to ask you to hand in you Samoan card there buddy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryB Posted April 11, 2015 Report Share Posted April 11, 2015 Going to have to ask you to hand in you Samoan card there buddyConsider it handed in Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.